Bank of Canada’s Rules for Reproducing Canadian Bank Notes – Example of a Key Advertising Review Question: “Do We Own It”?

A lot of advertising law, both in Canada and other major jurisdictions, tends to revolve around two major themes: deception and ownership.  As such, when it comes to reviewing advertising for compliance in Canada, a lot of issues (or potential issues) can be identified with two main questions: first, “is it true” (i.e., false or misleading)?; and second, “do we own it”?

I’ve written a lot about the first theme here over the past few years (e.g., the false and misleading advertising provisions of the Competition Act), but not so much about the second theme.  On the second theme, a small question arose on a recent advertising review for a promotion for one of my clients.  In their draft creative, they were proposing to reproduce images of Canadian currency.

While this is not an issue I deal with frequently, I had recalled giving advice on this in the past.  And, based on essentially querying to myself whether we had rights to reproduce images of the currency, I took a look at the Bank of Canada’s policy on the reproduction of current bank notes.    Not surprising, like many private and public parties that hold copyrights or trade-marks, the Bank of Canada has had (and still does have) rules relating to the reproduction of current bank notes (see: Policy on the Reproduction of Bank Note Images).

The Bank of Canada’s Bank Note Reproduction Policy generally relates to the Criminal Code’s counterfeiting and reproduction of bank note offences (sections 449, 457 and 462) and the Copyright Act.  The Bank’s Policy requires that, generally, permission be obtained from the Bank to reproduce a bank note image in commercial marketing (with a list of information for consent applications and common conditions imposed by the Bank when permission is granted – see: here).

While there is, for example, an exception to the Criminal Code reproduction of bank note offence where certain requirements are met (relating to the size and color of the images, etc.), the Bank takes a broad position with respect to the control of bank note images stating:

“Even in those cases where the reproduction of the bank note image is not an offence under the Criminal Code or the Copyright Act, the Bank is still entitled to enforce its copyright through civil action.”

and:

“To avoid the risk of potential criminal and civil consequences, the Bank’s written permission for the reproduction of bank note images must be obtained before the image is reproduced”.

Some good news for advertisers on this perhaps slightly arcane point (reproduction of current Canadian bank notes): the Bank of Canada does have a written permission process (see above); “generic” or stock photos of money generally can be used rather than copyrighted Bank of Canada imagery (though the same consent/license principles apply before reproducing 3rd party imagery); and under the Bank’s policy, Bank of Canada permission is generally not required for film or video productions (e.g., television commercials) where some requirements are met.

In any event, I thought this was a good, if slightly obscure, example of one of the two key advertising review questions – i.e., “is it true” and “do we own it”.

____________________

SERVICES AND CONTACT

I am a Toronto competition/antitrust lawyer and advertising/marketing lawyer who helps clients in Toronto, Canada and the US practically navigate Canada’s advertising and marketing laws and offers Canadian advertising/marketing law services in relation to print, online, new media, social media and e-mail marketing.

My Canadian advertising/marketing law services include advice in relation to: anti-spam legislation (CASL); Competition Bureau complaints; the general misleading advertising provisions of the federal Competition Act; Internet, new media and social media advertising and marketing; promotional contests (sweepstakes); and sales and promotions. I also provide advice relating to specific types of advertising issues, including performance claims, testimonials, disclaimers, drip pricing, astroturfing and native advertising.

For more information about my services, see: services

To contact me about a potential legal matter, see: contact

For more regulatory law updates follow me on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney

This entry was posted in Advertising Law, Articles, Competition Law, Consumer Protection, Intellectual Property, Internet Advertising, Online Advertising, Publications, Sectors - Internet & New Media, Sectors - Media and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.