Overviews
- Advertising Law Terms
- Advertising Law
- Advisory Opinions
- Bureau Enforcement
- CASL (Anti-spam Law)
- CASL Compliance
- CASL Compliance Errors
- CASL Compliance Tips
- CASL FAQs – I
- CASL FAQs – II
- CASL Law Terms – A-M
- CASL Law Terms – N-Z
- CASL Precedents
- Competition Act Amendments
- Competition Bureau Complaints
- Competition Law
- Competition Law Terms
- Complaints
- Compliance
- Contests
- Contests and CASL
- Contests and Quebec
- Contest Forms/Precedents – I
- Contest Forms/Precedents – II
- Contest Law FAQs
- Contest Law Terms – A-C
- Contest Law Terms – D-H
- Contest Law Terms – I-M
- Contest Law Terms – N-S
- Contest Law Terms – T-Z
- Contests and Social Media
- Contest Law Tips
- Deceptive Prize Notices
- Disclaimers
- Drip Pricing
- General Impression Test
- Green Claims
- Influencer/Co-Sponsor Agreements
- Influencer Marketing
- Internet Advertising
- Made in Canada Claims
- MAP Policies
- Market Studies
- Misleading Advertising
- Misleading Advertising FAQs
- OSP Claims/Sales
- Packaging and Labelling
- Performance Claims
- Price Claims
- Quotes
- Rebates
- Regulated Conduct Defence
- Reprisal Actions
- Scarcity Cues
- Testimonials and Endorsements
- Trip/Destination Contests
- Contact
- Terms of Use
Categories
Archives
Category Archives: Sectors – Telecommunications
Social Media Contests: New Podcast: “Is Your Social Media Contest Breaking the Law?”
CANADIAN CONTEST RULES/PRECEDENTS Do you need contest rules/precedents for a Canadian contest? We offer many types of Canadian contest/sweepstakes law precedents and forms (i.e., Canadian contest/sweepstakes law precedents to run common types of contests in Canada). These include precedents for random draw contests (i.e., where … Read the rest of this entry »
Canadian Court Takes Measured Approach to Imposing $500,000 Civil Fine Against Rogers in Performance Claims Case
In an interesting and important decision issued by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on February 21st, the Court has now imposed a $500,000 civil administrative monetary penalty (“AMP”) against Rogers for failing to have performed adequate and proper testing in some Canadian markets for … Read the rest of this entry »
Canada’s New Anti-Spam Law (CASL): Federal Enforcement Agencies Work Out Enforcement For New Law
CANADIAN CASL (ANTI-SPAM LAW) PRECEDENTS Do you need a precedent or checklist to comply with CASL (Canadian anti-spam law)? We offer Canadian anti-spam law (CASL) precedents and checklists to help electronic marketers comply with CASL. These include checklists and precedents for express consent requests (including … Read the rest of this entry »
Canadian Competition & Advertising Law: 2013 Year in Review 1: Misleading Advertising
Steve Szentesi Kevin Wright (Davis LLP) Extract from a chapter to be published in CLEBC Annual Review of Law & Practice – 2014 2013 was once again a busy year for Canadian competition and foreign investment law, administration and policy, including the June 12, 2013 … Read the rest of this entry »
Updated Overview of Canada’s New Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL)
CANADIAN CASL (ANTI-SPAM LAW) PRECEDENTS Do you need a precedent or checklist to comply with CASL (Canadian anti-spam law)? We offer Canadian anti-spam law (CASL) precedents and checklists to help electronic marketers comply with CASL. These include checklists and precedents for express consent requests (including … Read the rest of this entry »
Canadian CRTC issues New FAQs & Compliance Guidance for Impending Anti-spam Legislation (CASL)
CANADIAN CASL (ANTI-SPAM LAW) PRECEDENTS Do you need a precedent or checklist to comply with CASL (Canadian anti-spam law)? We offer Canadian anti-spam law (CASL) precedents and checklists to help electronic marketers comply with CASL. These include checklists and precedents for express consent requests (including … Read the rest of this entry »
No Happy Holidays for Deceptive Telemarketer – Pleads Guilty to Deceptive Telemarketing, Nine Months Imprisonment
Yesterday the Competition Bureau announced that a Quebec telemarketer has pleaded guilty to deceptive telemarketing under the Competition Act and fraud under the Criminal Code and was sentenced to nine months imprisonment. According to the Bureau, this particular telemarketing operation had been promoting “government grants” … Read the rest of this entry »
