Hockey Helmet Performance Claims Case Illustrates Competition Act Compliance Requirements

Practical Law Canada Competition (of which I am Lawyer Editor) has published a new Legal Update, which discusses recent enforcement by the Competition Bureau against an ice hockey helmet manufacturer in relation to allegedly unsupported performance claims. The Legal Update includes an overview of the case, requirements imposed by the Competition Act on product or service performance claims and implications for advertisers.

_________________

On November 17, 2020, the Competition Bureau (Bureau) announced that it had reached a consent agreement with TRUE Sports Inc. (TRUE Sports) relating to hockey helmet performance claims made by the hockey equipment manufacturer (see Competition Bureau, News Release, Competition Bureau completes investigation into performance claims related to TRUE hockey helmets (November 17, 2020)).

According to the Bureau, TRUE Sports had made performance claims relating to its helmets that gave the general impression that they could reduce the risk of concussions. The advertising claims in this case were made by the manufacturer through the use of diagrams, illustrations and text.

While TRUE Sports had conducted laboratory testing prior to making the claims, the Bureau’s position was that the testing was not adequate and proper to support them. In particular, the Bureau determined that the hockey equipment manufacturer relied in part on brain injury studies that largely focused on sports with fundamentally different patterns of injuries than those suffered playing hockey.

Under the True Sports, Inc. – Registered Consent Agreement negotiated with the Bureau, TRUE Sports agreed to donate $100,000 worth of sports equipment to charity, or a hockey league or association, stop making unfounded performance claims and implement an enhanced competition law compliance program. For more information about competition law compliance programs, see Practice Note, Competition Law Compliance Programs and Standard Document, Competition Law Compliance Program.

For the complete Legal Update, see: Hockey Helmet Performance Claims Case Illustrates Competition Act Compliance Requirements.

____________________

SERVICES AND CONTACT

I am a Toronto competition/antitrust lawyer and advertising/marketing lawyer who helps clients in Toronto, Canada and the US practically navigate Canada’s advertising and marketing laws and offers Canadian advertising/marketing law services in relation to print, online, new media, social media and e-mail marketing.

My Canadian advertising/marketing law services include advice in relation to: anti-spam legislation (CASL); Competition Bureau complaints; the general misleading advertising provisions of the federal Competition Act; Internet, new media and social media advertising and marketing; promotional contests (sweepstakes); and sales and promotions. I also provide advice relating to specific types of advertising issues, including performance claims, testimonials, disclaimers, drip pricing, astroturfing and native advertising.

For more information about my services see: services

To contact me about a potential legal matter see: contact

For more regulatory law updates follow me on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney

This entry was posted in Advertising Law, Articles, Cases, Comparative Advertising, Competition Bureau, Competition Law, Compliance, Consumer Protection, Electronic Marketing, Internet Advertising, New Publications, News, Online Advertising, Packaging and Labelling, Performance Claims, Publications, Sectors - Internet & New Media, Sectors - Retail, Social media marketing and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.